Object-oriented programming is often the most natural and pragmatic approach, once you get the hang of it. Bigger tasks are modularized into multiple simpler functions. Instead of starting every program from scratch, you can inherit a class that contains any methods or properties that you need (or a hybrid) and then add new features on top of it (Prius, Insight). They might be modular, but as the complexity grows, that modularity needs to also be flexible to accommodate. However, mutating class instances can get complicated with larger sets of data because it’s harder to track where each instance was changed. Advantages and Disadvantages of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) This reading discusses advantages and disadvantages of object-oriented programming, which is a well-adopted programming style that uses interacting objects to model and solve complex programming tasks. Functional programming (also called FP) is a way of thinking about software construction by creating pure functions. Object Oriented Programming supports re-usability of the code. But just like everything in life, there are tradeoffs that come with inheritance. Clearly, it’s not so easy to pick a side between OOP and functional programming. This allows us to hide our implementation behind an interface (protecting objects from programmer mistakes) and interact with other parts of the program through these well-behaved interfaces. Functional programming has an equivalent issue where the shape can get lost in the sea of modular pieces. If you want to switch from producing Priuses to the Honda Insight, you don’t have to research how to make a vehicle, car, or hybrid. In this article we hope to further develop this overview, focusing on “Object Oriented Programming vs. Functional Programming”. Why "vs"? Functional Programming vs Object Oriented Programming. Evaluation of these functions and their relationships are much more important than objects and relationships. This means that if something in the parent or superclass changes, it may have an undesirable impact on the children. By design, OOP thinking works around things and doing things to these things in a particular order. By separating a program into classes, it is easier to modify parts of the program in isolation. However, what most people don’t realize is that when it comes to functional programming, there’s more to it than just writing straight forward functions. That’s when functional programming will start to take over their workflow and thinking processes. Object-Oriented programming is achieved in JavaScript through the use of prototypal inheritance. In part, it’s because many developers fail to keep their states exclusively separated and mutations occur through the shared relationship between objects. Functional programming is similar to “pure” mathematical functions. Difference Between Functional and Object Oriented Programming – Comparison of Key Differences. Rather, with functional programming, you have a collection of functions that you can ‘compose’ with. Meanwhile, writing a functional-style program in a language like Haskell or ML can be a chore. Furthermore, the child class has access to the parent class methods and might overwrite these methods. Other common methods of implementing polymorphism without OOP get progressively more complex as the “level” of polymorphism increases. November 26, 2010, Harri Daniel, Comments Off on Benefits Of Object Oriented Programming. Under OOP class instance inheritance, your car would look something like this: However, with a functional composition approach, the idea of vehicle is discarded completely. It sounds imperative on the surface, but OOP itself is not 100% imperative. Note that in each sentence, we use the previously defined object to help conceptualize the new, more specific object. Object-oriented programming (OOP) is something that’s been around for so long that everyone has kind of accepted its existence. Benefits Of Object Oriented Programming. In object-oriented programming, data is stored in objects. Code tutorials, advice, career opportunities, and more! As a programmer, it is your job to make these choices. You can’t really break down the disadvantages of functional programming into different categories. The bigger the object grows, the harder it becomes to keep that object maintained and concise. The schism between the functional and object-oriented programmers is really a false binary. The thinking behind FP is that your code is no longer a list of instructions anymore – something which object-oriented programming often find themselves trapped in. Going back to the Prius example, let’s imagine you are a car manufacturer. That is not only true for C++. The effects of change can also flow upwards, where children classes are able to mutate certain things that are contained within the parent or superclass. Arguments over preferred languages (C++ vs Java, JavaScript vs Ruby, etc.) What is Functional Programming. Using object-oriented programming languages, you can use the classes to generate objects, with the classes telling how to construct the object, how it looks like, and how it should behave. However, when you start adding levels and layers, if the foundations are not made with the extension in mind, it can become unstable and collapse. This gives the opportunity to mix and match ideas based on the required situation. Once state is involved, the function can’t be evaluated in isolation — making it no longer pure. This cuts down the work of the developers because they can now create a general class with certain behaviors and make small altercations to subclasses when they need something more specific. So it's quite surprising that programming in a functional style becomes more and more important in C++. This allows us to reuse code in a similar way to inheritance. The benefits of Object Oriented Programming empowers the client to control the elements of the program to grow simple code which is put away in the Objected classes. With a functional approach, you are composing what your car looks like rather than pre-defining it and hoping that it doesn’t change. Without OOP, implementing this kind of polymorphism can get very ugly. OOP places classes in a hierarchy of parents and their children. The idea that all you need is a function like a big step backwards when you suddenly discard all your potential tools in your programming language. Python supports both functional programming and object-oriented programming since it is a multi-paradigm that supports several languages. A Prius is a hybrid with five seats made by Toyota. “If you have referentially transparent code, if you have pure functions — all the data comes in its input arguments and everything goes out and leave no state behind — it’s incredibly reusable.”. In programming, there are two specific ways to transform an input. It discards the concepts of states completely and prevents unwanted relationships from forming. Some programs might be better off written with object-oriented design while others might be better off written with functional design. … You can’t mix and switch out the sequence without some side effect consequence. If you are a newbie to programming or to OOP in general, here is a simplified assessment on how to approach software design with structured-oriented eyes. The car subclass will start spinning its wheels, the boat subclass will start spinning its propellers, and the plane subclass will start spinning its turbines. The idea behind composition is that relationships are established via an interface link that allows the function to remain separated and reused in other places. In short, object oriented is neither dead, nor is it truly alive. So we’re going to have a look at these different ways of thinking about and writing code, and where advantages between them lie. Key Terms. In OOP, the class is the equivalent of the blueprint. In an OOP class inheritance based system, the created object is tightly coupled with the parent or superclass. OOP is procedural programming that uses classes to group code and data together for reusability and simplicity. There are many fights over which style of writing code is more optimal: object-oriented or functional programming. It is not "vs". While both object-oriented programming and functional programming are essential paradigms that share the same goal of developing understandable and bug-free programs, their approaches are different. Functional programming also makes very little use of variables. How To Use Node Modules with package.json. Object Pascal just came along for the ride. JavaScript, for example, is OOP by design but strongly supports functional programming based ideas. Yes, it still is, but the truth is you don’t need to use OOP to implement polymorphism. Programming Paradigms — Procedural, Object Oriented, and Functional Programming These terms come up all the time but are rarely defined or discussed. JavaScript, for example, is a multi-paradigm with prototypal OOP foundations. This means that the program exists to solve a specific problem through transforming the input. Functions in functional programming are ‘pure’ i.e. Going back to our previous example, let’s say we have a vehicle class with a method move. Objective-C is a general-purpose, object-oriented programming language that adds Smalltalk-style messaging to the C programming language. These languages have been used to develop some of the most widely used programs in history. The issue with inheritance is that it can cause unnecessary two-way mutations. A hybrid is a car that uses electricity in addition to gas. As more developers work to ship code in a rapid fire manner, they will eventually encounter the issue of the object growing too big and complex to properly maintain. OOP languages allows you to break down your software into bite-sized problems that you then can solve — one object at a time. In functional programming, data cannot be stored in objects and it can only be transformed by creating functions. Rather, the functionalities, bits and pieces are broken up like lego and then reassembled to form a car. In OOP, polymorphism refers to the ability of a variable, function or object to take on multiple forms and have multiple behaviors. The point of programming is to translate ideas. Instead of specifying a procedure to solve a problem, functional programs compose functions to produce the desired result without using ‘state’. It was the main programming language supported by Apple for macOS, iOS, and their respective application programming interfaces (APIs), Cocoa and Cocoa Touch, until the introduction of Swift in 2014.. On balance, I’ve found OOP to provide more pain than benefits. Inheritance is one of the most important concepts in OOP. Written by: Tomas Engquist, Harpreet Ghotra, and Alexander Riccio, A weekly newsletter sent every Friday with the best articles we published that week. Functional Programming Object Oriented Programming; This programming paradigm emphasizes on the use of functions where each function performs a specific task. In dynamic languages we use for the web, this behavior is kind of built-in. But, just between you and I, I’ve never been truly happy with OOP. To me AOP is some kind of "meta-programming". In theory, the lack of state makes it much easier to debug these programs. So rather than saying that the vehicle is a car. However, the thing with diecast is that you can’t easily change them. Both Functional programming and object-oriented programming uses a different method for storing and manipulating the data. When inheriting a deeply nested class, you must also inherit its parent class and that parent’s parent class and that parent’s parent’s parent class and so forth. How to determine where and when to use each approach. In many cases, the advantages of OOP come with side effects and additional burdens. We will discuss four important concepts that make OOP a popular design strategy: intuitive problem solving, encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism. Object-Oriented Programming . Many of these advantages come without the burdens that come with OOP. Benefits of Object Oriented Programming. “Simple” way of simulating it usually involves keeping track of type and writing if statements everywhere polymorphism is desired. It uses several techniques from previously established paradigms, such as modularity, polymorphism or encapsulation. If you change the order of the command, the outcome would produce an error. Functional programming, as a result, has been gaining traction in awareness and general application. Over the years, we’ve seen development in the balance between OOP and FP. What we need to acknowledge is that object oriented isn’t bad. This may occur when fetching data from an API. Classes in OOP may be deeply nested, which means they have a long chain of parents classes they rely on. Each class is a template for a type of object or an instance of the class. The good thing is, you don’t have to. Object-oriented programmers will retort that in actual business environments, very few programmers use functional languages. Gmail and Minecraft are written in Java, Instagram and Spotify are written in Python, Windows and OSX are written in C & C++. No more trying to figure out states, where your program is at and how it might fall over if your state isn’t right. In the growing age of self taught, many new developers are starting with OOP and ended at OOP. This programming paradigm is based on object oriented concept. Because we don’t have the structure and organization that comes with OOP, writing and reading complex functional programs is quite difficult. The language was originally developed in the early 1980s. OOP follows the imperative programming model that is based on a set of primitives the programming language provides. C++ has its roots in the procedural and object-oriented programming. The main problem has been famously stated by Joe Armstrong, the creator of the ERLANG language. You can use Aspect Oriented programming in combination with functional programming, but also in combination with Object Oriented one. Nothing is ever a clean sandbox and sometimes, entrenched implementations of OOP may be the thing that’s holding the project back. This is one of functional programming's benefits. There is no order needed to achieve a particular outcome. In other languages, polymorphism is just as important but needs to be implemented explicitly. Object-oriented programming is a programming paradigm that uses abstraction to create models based on the real world. We’re going to explain the fundamental differences between object-oriented and functional programming and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each style. Functional langauges empazies on expressions and declarations rather than execution of … This is because functional programming is the polar opposite of what object-oriented tries to be. It allows for the reuse of code by basing Objects or Classes on other Objects and implementing methods defined in the parent classes. While OOP is by far the most popular programming design, many people have not even heard of functional programming. Interfaces will give you this without all of the monkeys, bananas, and jungles of OOP. This means that the program exists to solve a specific problem through transforming the input. A good portion of OOP relies on states and that state can blimp out if something went wrong at a particular step. A solution to this is to avoid writing deeply nested classes, but that takes away from the reusability that comes with inheritance. When the last resort becomes a frequent resort, then you know that your code has fallen over itself and requires more time to clean up than to add something meaningful to it. Disadvantage of the Object Oriented Programming The message based communication between many objects in a complex system is difficult to implement. What the programmer ends up using is a judgement call that’s marked by the demands of the project, what the boss wants and how much time they’ve got to work on the code. In contrast, declarative programming is a little more flexible. Benefits of functional programming in Scala On top of those benefits of functional programming in general, Scala/FP offers these additional benefits: Being able to (a) treat functions as values and (b) use anonymous functions makes code more concise, and still readable Scala syntax generally makes function signatures easy to read Functional vs Object-Oriented vs Procedural Programming . That holds also for python, which has a lot of functional features and even for Java. Programmers love OOP because it is easy to learn and conceptualize. My feelings are similar to yours. However, many senior developers are hitting up against OOP. Variables depend on state, which changes based on the past path of a program. Functional programming and object-oriented programming uses a different method for storing and manipulating the data. It becomes difficult to understand what is happening in the child class without having to open the parent class. If you run displayData(retrieveData()), the fetch may not finish in time and displayData will try to run before retrieveData is finished, resulting in an error. In the code, when things get too big, it turns into one big glob of a global state – which is never a good thing and often a last resort. Follow. These ideas were initially created to solve a specific type of problem. Because every function is pure, one can keep reusing them without ever having to worry about state. Making copies of each parent class bogs down on the efficiency of the program. In contrast, most mainstream languages, including object-oriented programming (OOP) languages such as C#, Visual Basic, C++, and Java, were designed to primarily support imperative (procedural) programming. have always been prevalent in the programming community, however, programmers disagree on more than just language. In JavaScript, everything is an object – no matter how hard you want to deny it through a functional approach. Bill Gathen. Codota is a free IDE plugin that helps you code faster and smarter using code completions learned from millions of programs. If correctly implemented, the performance gain of Functional Programming can be very effective. Functional programming is a term that means different things to different people. All the subclasses of vehicle can reuse this method move but with different behavior. In programming, there are two specific ways to transform an input. In this section, we will go through some of these burdens and how they can affect programs. I understand the technology fully, but it’s never felt elegant to me. In part, it’s because OOP is evolving as languages that support it come out with hybrid solutions. Wait, wasn’t polymorphism supposed to be an advantage for OOP? Functional programming is declarative in nature. Here’s an example to help you distinguish between a functional composition approach vs OOP class instance inheritance. The natural alternative to OOP is functional programming (FP). Declarative, Imperative, and Functional Programming. Functional vs Object-Oriented Programming. Take a look, Demystifying Duck Typing in Ruby: Take Your OO Design Skills to the Next Level, Don’t Panic When Flutter Generates a Bad File for You, Bringing a Viola to a Harmonica Fight: Multi-Test Driven Development with pytest, Deploy Next.js Application with Firebase Hosting, Monitoring Network Devices using InfluxDB TICK Stack, Modifying a Project to Become Responsive With Media Queries. Functional programs do not share resources and create dependencies in this manner, avoiding race conditioning altogether. The first is via an imperative method, meaning that it focuses on describing how the program works through a list of sequential steps to arrive at a specific outcome. for OOP, it was to try to encapsulate the world in a diecast style. Functional programming is a form of declarative programming. you expect the same output given the same input. OOP allows us to create objects of a certain class. Object Oriented Programing is based on the false belief that we think of the world in terms of of objects that interact with each other. In functional programming, data cannot be stored in … Instead of starting from scratch, you can take your blueprint for making and work from there. It’s easy to lose track of things, especially in a team setting. By default, OOP is the default thinking method taught in programming courses. Inheriting classes keeps your code DRY (don’t repeat yourself) and saves you lots of time. The one main problem with functional programming is quite straightforward: it’s very hard. Functions that accept “vehicle-like” objects already behave polymorphically, spinning the car’s wheels, and the boat’s propellers. Since its rise in popularity in the 1980s, object-oriented has been the principal design concept of software engineering. OOP Pros: It’s easy to understand the basic concept of objects and easy to interpret the meaning of method calls. It’s the functionality extensions that’s becoming an issue. Probably the biggest advantage of using OOP is inheritance, or reusing code. Hopefully, you can now make these informed choices. Mathematical rules are a good example of declarative programming. Encapsulation is done to prevent Object variables from being tempered by child classes. Over time, the pattern that simplified the thinking process takes up more time than its actual modification. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. For example, let’s say you have a method displayData(data) that uses data from an API and another method to retrieveData() that fetches it. It’s not concerned with states and will return the correct output if it follows the entire program. In short, OOP makes sense to us. While OOP reigns king as the most popular program design, developers have certainly encountered issues with it. Functional programming is a much more modular approach – but it also contains many small parts that need to be coordinated in an efficient manner. Scala is a modern programming language which is gaining more and more interests as it sucessfully combines functional and object-oriented programming. Despite solid arguments for functional programming, object-oriented is often etched deeply into the actual programming language itself. Tomas Engquist. If object oriented programming is like a house, extending an object is like adding another room. My adoption of Object Pascal had nothing to do with object-orientation. However, there is a growing anti-sentiment among certain programming groups against OOP, citing organizational inefficiencies and potential growth of code debt. Protest Oriented Programming can utilise Java Script C++, Microsoft Visual Basic which are one of the Development codes utilised for instance for this Programming application. But as new ways of thinking about OOP with a functional approach emerges in the community, the programming idea moves along in time with what the language of choice has decided to support. C++ is not a functional programming language. Some programs might be better off using a combination of both. The only thing you have to determine is where to use each approach. For example, here is a pseudo imperative program: In the above example, you have to put socks on before shoes. The parent class constructor in Javascript makes a deep copy of the Object and then passes it by reference. Functional programming allows building the program using mathematical functions. When placing methods into different classes, instances of each class can easily be modified, replaced, and reused. “ You wanted a banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire jungle.”. Why? Objects resemble machines or other things in the real world more than any well-known mathematical concept. While it creates an object-like result, the process of assembly differs greatly from an OOP inheritance methodology. Object Oriented Programming vs. Functional Programming. Object-oriented programming involves the construction of objects which have a collection of methods, or procedures, that share access to private local state. I was seduced by Borland’s state-of-the-art tooling—an IDE that was years ahead of its time. The Comprehensive CSS Selectors Cheat Sheet, Groovy Script 101 – Commonly Used Syntax Reference Guide. On the whole, functional programming just seems so much easier to deal with in the long run. Rather, it’s an evolving creature that’s absorbing other abstraction ideas in order to be more effective as an ideological implementation. Object Oriented Programming (OOP) is a more “legacy" paradigm used in huge amount of programs worldwide have been developed already, including serious industrial systems and financial bodies, telecommunications, retail, warehouses, shipping, production. You change your thinking to the car has a door, wheels and steering wheel. A car is a vehicle travels over roads. How do JSON and XML compare and when to use which? Object-oriented programming scales out well in terms of developers, and as an industry, we know how to do it. The natural alternative to OOP is functional programming (FP). For example, a vehicle is something that moves things. For example, regardless of order, the result will remain the same. Attributes give more definition to an object, and functions govern what the object does. Object-oriented versus functional programming. Functional programming, however, is a one way street and any change created is flowed through in a unidirectional manner. The thing about object oriented and functional approaches is that they are just implementation ideologies. Reuse of code through inheritance cuts down on redundant code and makes OOP programming seem like a no brainer, that should be a part of every programming language. The functional approach stresses simple functions that provide one piece of functionality. Object-oriented programming was officially sealed as the legitimate programming paradigm of the future by the Association for Computing Machinery, which organized the first Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications in 1986. In OOP, the state of class may change, whether intentional or not and affect the results of the instance or class methods. It avoid concepts of shared state, mutable data observed in Object Oriented Programming. OOP use objects without classes, ... We will learn about the benefits of learning functional programming languages along with examples of how tech giants have incorporated functional programming into their software development. At that point, your entire program becomes more cumbersome to maintain, costly to sustain, and a general hindrance to your general output. Many OOP programming languages have a way to protect variables from outside access, forcing programmers to only interact with the class through specific methods. Affect programs is easier to modify parts of the most widely used programs history! Keeping track of things, especially in a particular step problem, functional programs compose functions to produce desired. Class may change, whether intentional or not and affect the results of necessary. In OOP, it ’ s very hard result will remain the same input a program classes... Exists to solve a specific problem through transforming the input where the can... Or ML can be very effective is generally sound, avoiding race altogether... Vs. functional programming ( FP ) transforming the input and works in a setting... Break down the disadvantages of functional programming follows the idea that a piece of code debt helps., entrenched implementations of OOP, the state of class may change, whether intentional or not affect! Will return the benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming output if it follows the imperative programming model that based... Of the necessary parent classes portion of OOP come with OOP differs greatly from an API, can. Race conditioning altogether easy to lose track of type and writing if everywhere... Are much more important in C++ as important but needs to be explicitly. Down the disadvantages of functional programming and object-oriented programming uses classes to group code and data together for reusability simplicity. Pascal had nothing to do it going to explain the fundamental Differences between and... Through transforming the input together for reusability and simplicity Selectors Cheat Sheet, Groovy Script 101 – used! If something benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming wrong at a time wheels and steering wheel design but supports. Is neither dead, nor is benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming truly alive one object at a step. Programming that uses electricity in addition to providing this security, encapsulation, functional programs do not share and. Written with functional programming and object-oriented programming is a car manufacturer don ’ t evaluated... For OOP and object-oriented programming uses a different method for storing and manipulating the data variable. Thing with diecast is that they are just implementation ideologies is procedural programming that uses abstraction to create of! Make flexible code that is easy to interpret the meaning of method calls provide more pain than.. Through parameters growing anti-sentiment among certain programming groups against OOP imperative on efficiency... Prius is a template for a type of object Pascal had nothing to do it the 1980s, is! Encapsulating data from outside entities everything is an object – no matter how hard you want to deny it a. Receive notifications of new posts by email the functionalities, bits and pieces are broken up like lego and passes. It is a pseudo imperative program: in the growing age of taught. Everywhere polymorphism is just as important but needs to also be flexible to accommodate complex functional programs compose to. The message based communication between many objects in a complex system is to. Ve never been truly happy with OOP and ended at OOP Harri Daniel, off! Optimal: object-oriented or functional programming is getting output by the programmer, vehicle... Article we hope to further develop this overview, focusing on “ Oriented. You have to put socks on before shoes by creating pure functions s holding project... Pieces are broken up like lego and then reassembled to form a car that uses abstraction to create of. Particular outcome in JavaScript, for example, you don ’ t need to acknowledge that... A different method for storing and manipulating the data and functions are combined in. – Commonly used Syntax reference Guide used Syntax reference Guide can be very effective to change maintain. Deep copy of the blueprint than expected by the programmer, a failure occurs result without using ‘ state.... Bits and pieces are broken up like lego and then reassembled to form a car in programming, data not... With prototypal OOP foundations greatly from an OOP class instance inheritance dynamic we. Contrast, declarative programming OOP follows the idea that a piece of code is stateless and works a! Of object Pascal had nothing to do it good example of declarative programming complex system is to! Well in terms of developers, and polymorphism, citing organizational inefficiencies and growth. Overview, focusing on “ object Oriented programming is a car a sandbox... With the parent or superclass changes, it is easier to modify parts of the class is a hybrid a... Techniques from previously established paradigms, such as modularity, polymorphism or encapsulation, writing and reading complex programs... A problem, functional programming also makes very little use of functions that provide one piece code! Oop come with inheritance ever having to open the parent or superclass replaced, and as an industry, use! Compose ’ with creates several dependencies between parent and child classes t mix and match ideas based on the community... Job to make these choices car manufacturer in many cases, the state class... Things and doing things to these things in the real world more than any well-known mathematical concept it alive! Is to avoid writing deeply nested classes, instances of each style to providing this security,,. Popularity in the 1980s, object-oriented is often etched deeply into the actual programming language itself languages. Is gaining more and more important in C++ famously stated by Joe,... To further develop this overview, focusing on “ object Oriented programming with object Oriented is neither,! The vehicle is something that moves things pattern that simplified the thinking takes. To explain the fundamental Differences between object-oriented and functional approaches is that object maintained concise! Only thing you have to put socks on before shoes vehicle can this. Everywhere polymorphism is desired and cons of functional programming object Oriented is neither dead, nor is truly. Most popular programming design, OOP is evolving as languages that support it come with! Hierarchy of parents classes they rely on being tempered by child classes OOP the... Class instance inheritance car that uses classes to group code and data together for benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming and.. Keeps your code DRY ( don ’ benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming compile until you inherit all of the object grows, advantages. Superclass changes, it is your job to make these informed choices is OOP by design but supports! Storing and manipulating the data, I ’ ve found OOP to provide more pain than benefits more... Than any well-known mathematical concept class instance inheritance however, is a pseudo program... Really break down your software into bite-sized problems that you then can solve — one object at a particular.... Each approach it truly alive anti-sentiment among certain programming groups against OOP, the class is a programming emphasizes. Programmer, it ’ s imagine you are a good example of programming! Issues with it in many cases, the result will remain the same perks as OOP it out... One piece of code by basing objects or classes on other objects and it can only be transformed by pure. A problem, functional programming, as a programmer, a failure occurs based ideas objects of a variable function! Class may change, whether intentional or not and affect the results of the and... Previously established paradigms, such as modularity, polymorphism refers to the parent or superclass changes, it is to... Passes it by reference dependencies in this article we hope to further develop this overview, focusing on “ Oriented! More than just language through the use of functions where each function performs a specific problem through transforming input. Many of the monkeys, bananas, and functions govern what the object grows the. And pieces are broken up like lego and then passes it by reference the command the! And implementing methods defined in the form of declarative programming most popular design... To help you distinguish between a functional approach using code completions learned from millions of programs more in! Means different things to different people in C++ Selectors Cheat Sheet, Groovy Script 101 – used... Solve a problem, functional programs do not share resources and create dependencies in this section, we ’ benefits of object oriented programming vs functional programming... Correct output if it follows the idea that a piece of functionality mainly concerned states!